Subject: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree? From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:10:09 +0000 |
A couple days ago Michael Kay wrote: Inspection operations on an element are operations that can be performed while positioned at the start tag. Inspection operations include: count(), exists(), name(). Absorption operations are operations that require access to the whole subtree. Absorption operations include: string(), data(), xsl:value-of Michael, doesn't the count() function require access to the whole subtree? How would a count be conducted by sitting at the top of a subtree? Perhaps you meant to say that the count() function is an absorption operation? /Roger
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defau, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, David Carlisle |
Month |