|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Comparing documents: what of P is a subset of D? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:32:31 +0000 |
I'm not sure I've completely understood your "equality" relation that
underpins the intersection. Perhaps it's based on equality of the function
string-join(ancestor-or-self::*/@_ix, '|')
let's call this function $f, and we can use this as a parameter to the rest of
the solution.
we then need to do
doc('d.xml')//fc[some $e in doc('p.xml') satisfies $f($e) eq $f(.)] ! path(.)
where path(.) is a function you can write to display the path to the selected
fc element.
The only remaining problem is that this is O(n*m) where n and m are the sizes
of D and P. For a more efficient solution, define a key on P.XML that indexes
each element on the value of the function $f, and replace the predicate by a
call on key().
The above uses XPath 3.0, but it can probably be expressed in XPath 2.0 easily
enough at the cost of hard-coding the equality function.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
On 27 Feb 2014, at 10:25, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <cca><!-- a D XML -->
> <rela _ix='0' fa='0' fb='1'>
> <fc _ix='1' fc_fa='X1' fc_fb='1'/>
> <fc _ix='2' fc_fa='X2' fc_fb='2'/>
> </rela>
> <rela _ix='1' fa='10' fb='11'>
> <fc _ix='1' fc_fa='Y1' fc_fb='11'/>
> <fc _ix='2' fc_fa='Y2' fc_fb='12'/>
> </rela>
> <rela _ix='5' fa='50' fb='51'>
> <fc _ix='1' fc_fa='A1' fc_fb='51'/>
> <fc _ix='2' fc_fa='A2' fc_fb='52'/>
> </rela>
> <relb>...</relb>
> <relc>...</relc>
> </cca>
>
> <cca><!-- a P XML -->
> <rela _ix='1' fa='10'>
> <fc _ix='1' fc_fa='Y1' fc_fb='99'/>
> </rela>
> <rela _ix='5' fa='50' fb='51'>
> <fc _ix='1' fc_fb='51' fc_fc='123'/>
> <fc _ix='2' fc_fa='A2' fc_fb='52' fc_fc='456'/>
> </rela>
> </cca>
>
> Expected output:
>
> /cca/rela(1)/fa 10
> /cca/rela(1)/fc(1)/fc_fa Y1
> /cca/rela(5)/fa 50
> /cca/rela(5)/fa 51
> /cca/rela(5)/fc(1)/fc_fb 51
> /cca/rela(5)/fc(2)/fc_fa A2
> /cca/rela(5)/fc(2)/fc_fb 52
>
> Note that parentheses enclose values of @_ix.
>
> -W
>
> On 27/02/2014, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It would be easier to understand the problem with some example data.
>>
>> Michael Kay
>> Saxonica
>>
>> On 27 Feb 2014, at 08:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> The data model for a set of similarly (but not identically) built XML
>>> documents is: a collection of arrays of records, which may contain
>>> (recursively) arrays, records and scalars. (The terms "array" and
>>> "record" are used in their "classic" meaning as, e.g., in Pascal.)
>>> Document structures are fairly stable, but they do change over time.
>>> Array elements are identified (indexed) by @_ix, not by position.
>>> Record fields can be elements or attributes (when they are scalar).
>>> Order is undefined, since XPaths plus @_Ix's pinpoint each node.
>>>
>>> One XML document D contains a full population for such a data set
>>> (O(1MB)). A second XML document P contains "patches", i.e., each node
>>> appearing in P is expected to be in D as well.
>>>
>>> If S(P) is the sequence of nodes (annotated with their XPaths) in P
>>> and S(D) the one with nodes from D, how can I determine S(P) intersect
>>> S(D) (except all @_ix, whose values are bound to be identical)? Of
>>> course, I don't want the common set of *data items* - I want the XML
>>> paths of those common data items.
>>>
>>> A solution (in XSLT 2.0) should not need individual adaption for each
>>> kind of data set.
>>>
>>> I'm confident that I can create text files for D and P containing one
>>> line <path> <value> for each node and run diff (after sort).
>>>
>>> Any better ideas?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Wolfgang
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Comparing documents: what, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | Re: [xsl] Comparing documents: what, Wolfgang Laun |
| Re: [xsl] Escaped canonical XML?, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] toc with number with elem, Wendell Piez |
| Month |