Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 3.0: Question about: Disabling dynamic evaluation unconditionally From: "Eliot Kimber ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 18:02:54 -0000 |
I read that to mean that XSLT Processors are allowed to simply refuse to implement evaluation. Cheers, E. bbbbb Eliot Kimber, Owner Contrext, LLC http://contrext.com On 2/15/15, 11:52 AM, "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi, >At the end of Section "10.4.4 xsl:evaluate as an optional feature" of >the 2nd Last Call of the W3C XSLT 3.0 specification >(http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-xslt-30-20141002/#evaluation-as-optional-fea >ture) >, the last paragraph says: > >"Processors that implement xsl:evaluate should provide mechanisms >allowing calls on xsl:evaluate to be disabled. Implementations may >disable the feature by default, and they may disable it >unconditionally." > >My question is: > What is meant here by "they may disable it unconditionally" ? > >Is this something the XSLT processor decides by itself if a certain >kind of event occurs, and does disabling the feature "unconditionally" >mean that after the disablement, the feature can never be enabled >again? > >-- >Cheers, >Dimitre Novatchev
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSLT 3.0: Question about: Dis, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 3.0: Question about:, Wolfgang Laun wolfga |
[xsl] XSLT 3.0: Question about: Dis, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 3.0: Question about:, Wolfgang Laun wolfga |
Month |