Subject: Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subject to review" From: "Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 15:56:04 -0000 |
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 16:39, Piez, Wendell A. (Fed) wendell.piez@xxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dorothy, > > > > Among the interesting points made in your report is that it cannot actually check well-formedness. It says it can, but it is lying. > > > > (Or it would be lying were it capable of lying. What it is doing is what it was programmed to do, namely chat with you about your topic of choice.) Just so, I think we need half a new glossary of terms when we talk about these beasties <chuckles/> regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subj, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Thread | [no subject], Unknown |
Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subj, Dave Pawson dave.paw | Date | Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe |
Month |