Subject: Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subject to review" From: "Trevor Nicholls trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 16:15:52 -0000 |
Hallucin-AI-ting -----Original Message----- From: Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, 8 July 2023 03:56 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subject to review" On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 16:41, Norm Tovey-Walsh ndw@xxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > (Or it would be lying were it capable of lying. What it is doing is > > what it was programmed to do, namely chat with you about your topic > > of > > choice.) > > The term of art for LLMs just making [expletive] up seems to be > bhallucinatingb. (Any philosophers on the list?) IMHO that is anthropomorphism Yep, a whole new vocabulary! regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subj, Dave Pawson dave.paw | Thread | Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subj, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe |
Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Date | Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subj, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe |
Month |