> Essentially OK. But if you do your timing exactly right, you don't need to
> do the STA WSYNC.
> That is, you have a full 76 cycles available to do your stuff, so if you use
> exactly 76 cycles, you're smack bang set for starting the next scan line
> without requiring the WSYNC write. That's my understanding.
I agree, that if you put another 3 cycles in there, you would not need the
STA WSYNC. As to using the STA WSYNC as you describe, I would do a test
before trusting it. I can concieve this STA WSYNC as holding until the
end of the following line, just as well as working as you describe. Has
anyone filled a line like this?
Mark
--
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
