Subject: [stella] tangent: Supercharger vs. CV From: Rob <kudla@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:20:09 -0400 |
At 09:09 AM 4/25/01 -0400, I wrote: >Yeah, by the time the Supercharger came out I had a Colecovision. I never >even saw a Supercharger in any store. Let me just add here that by and large, I think the Supercharger games are better than most Colecovision games. This is mainly because the Supercharger had programmers behind it who were already versed in optimizing for the 2600, whereas most games released for the Colecovision seemed to be knocked off fairly quickly. Even if you compare Supercharger Frogger with Colecovision Frogger though, I think Supercharger Frogger is more playable and even looks better (better colors or something.) This is especially ironic considering the CV had the same processor as arcade Frogger and should have been able to reuse more of the code. Rob - Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Supercharger programming (was: , Rob | Thread | Aw: Re: Aw: Re: [stella] Dungeons, cybergoth |
Re: Supercharger programming (was: , Rob | Date | Re: [stella] Alive and kicking, Eckhard Stolberg |
Month |