Subject: Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL'd? (was StellaX PAL detection) From: "John Saeger" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:39:42 -0800 |
Brad Wrote: > Also i'm not a lawyer, however, I do not believe the incorporation of > Ron Fries code makes a program GPL'd. Ron's code is licensed under the > LGPL (not the GPL). The LGPL is a library license which basically says > you have allow people to recompile/rebuild the program that uses the > LGPL library. It doesn't state that the resulting program MUST be > released under the GPL or LGPL licenses like the GPL does. You are probably right about this. For some reason I never noticed the *library* in the Ron Fries GPL notice. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL'd? (was, Bradford W. Mott | Thread | Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL'd? (was, Thomas Jentzsch |
Re: Aw: Re: [stella] Is Stella GPL', Julian Squires | Date | Re: Aw: Re: [stella] Incoming, Ben Larson |
Month |