Subject: Re: [stella] COmpiler questions From: "Eric Ball" <ericball@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:31:56 -0500 |
> For instance, I have been using DASM for my experimentation, but I'm > inferring that there are many mroe options for a compiler that I'm just not > thinking of. Have been to a ton of sites over the past 6 months, and I'm > sure I've seen the other choices, but I'm drawign a blank. > > Therefore I have two questions: > 1a: WHat other good, rigorous 2600-compat assemblers are there, and what is > everyone using? Recommendations? > 1b: If this has been covered in depth, please send me to an existing FAQ. First, they aren't compilers, they are (macro) assemblers. Although DASM is the popular choice (and will become more as people develop & use the macro.h), you can use any 6502 assembler which can generate a raw (headerless) binary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] COmpiler questions, Andrew Davie | Thread | Re: RE: [stella] Source Code, Dennis Debro |
Re: [stella] COmpiler questions, Andrew Davie | Date | Re: [stella] COmpiler questions, voyd |
Month |