On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 22:20, ecwilkso@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Got it. So you actually measure the fps instead of computing it based on
> scanline count (or some other quantity)? How do you measure the time?
> What's the process you're using? (remember I'm not a software guy, so keep
> it high level if you can. ;)
I think we just ask SDL what time it is. Kinda boring. On dos it was
much more interesting. There was a timer chip with registers and
interrupt flags and stuff like that. I used to know it by heart. No
more...
> Heh...only if it compiles and decompiles properly. ;) And only if there's
> a runtime option for which machine to compile it to. After all...if it's
> written in Perl, it should be able to run on almost any architecture, including
> Atari 8-bits...right? :P
Or just embed it in a web page. Like those color demos. I wonder if it
would work?
John
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
