Subject: Re: [stella] Fast Missile code From: Manuel Rotschkar <cybergoth@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:22:20 +0100 |
Hi there! >Anyway, how about this one: > lda #4 > dcp torpedoyPos > adc #1 > sta ENAM1 > lda #4 > dcp torpedoyPos+1 > adc #1 > sta ENAM0 > >24 cycles! :-) Uhija! That is way cool! But maybe unusable in my case unfortunately. Hm... except if I'd provide a RAM array with several torpedoyPos pairs... Still I'd have to reload at least one pair... hm²... Let me see what I can make of this. Since I'm usually prefering simple solutions, the sheer brilliantness of this snippet is probably too hard to resist. :-) It's just perfect: No scannline count reqired, no stack, no register, the carry doesn't matter... Wait... shouldn't it rather be > lda #3 instead of > lda #4 Or did I miss something? Greetings, Manuel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Fast Missile code, Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | Re: [stella] Fast Missile code, Thomas Jentzsch |
Re: [stella] Fast Missile code, Thomas Jentzsch | Date | Re: [stella] Fast Missile code, Thomas Jentzsch |
Month |