Subject: Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPal 2600 From: Adam Thornton <adam@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:21:49 -0400 |
On May 16, 2005, at 10:15 PM, Kirk Israel wrote: > Hmmm, so would 3:2 or 4:2 be a better bet? I've heard two people > suggest 1.667:1 and one say 2 to 1 is indeed the best...does z26 get > it more or less right? > 2:1 is 2.000:1 12:7 is 1.714:1 5:3 is 1.667:1 3:2 is 1.500:1 So it sure looks like 3:2 is closer than 2:1. For NTSC, that is, not PAL. For PAL obviously 2:1 is quite close. Adam Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPa, Kirk Israel | Thread | Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPa, Kirk Israel |
Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPa, Kirk Israel | Date | [stella] no sync, Adam Wozniak |
Month |