Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPal 2600

Subject: Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPal 2600
From: Adam Thornton <adam@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:21:49 -0400
On May 16, 2005, at 10:15 PM, Kirk Israel wrote:

> Hmmm, so would 3:2 or 4:2 be a better bet? I've heard two people
> suggest 1.667:1 and one say 2 to 1 is indeed the best...does z26 get
> it more or less right?
>

2:1 is 2.000:1
12:7 is 1.714:1
5:3 is 1.667:1
3:2 is 1.500:1

So it sure looks like 3:2 is closer than 2:1.

For NTSC, that is, not PAL.  For PAL obviously 2:1 is quite close.

Adam
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com

Current Thread