Subject: RE: [stella] Stella 2.0 alpha 1 available From: Glenn Saunders <mos6507@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:35:32 -0400 |
Andrew, your suggestions are so fantastic. You took the words right out of my mouth. It's exactly the kind of stuff I want. I really like the idea of marking up the sourcecode to configure the debugger. If you do hotkey compile-and-loads into Stella from TextPad or some other editor that has command-line utilities like that, then DASM basically becomes an extension to the debugger, and it helps minimize the requirements of the debugger user-interface. Stella would not have to disassemble at all because it has the original sourcecode it can cross-reference. If Stella displays a copy of the commented sourcecode in its window, then it would only need to also put the line number on the margin and if you wanted to make an edit you could flip back to our text editor and go to that line number. Of course, at that point, it's a small leap to just give Stella an integreated (color coded) text editor. DASM itself can still be an external program. I can say for myself I never use anything more than the basic cut/copy/past/search/replace stuff in TextPad. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [stella] Stella 2.0 alpha 1 ava, Glenn Saunders | Thread | Re: [stella] Stella 2.0 alpha 1 ava, Adam Thornton |
RE: [stella] Stella 2.0 alpha 1 ava, Glenn Saunders | Date | Re: [stella] Stella 2.0 alpha 1 ava, Glenn Saunders |
Month |