Subject: Re: More entity confusion and my opinion on the right way From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:07:39 -0500 (EST) |
[David Carlisle] > There are a few more (which are supposed to be compatible with > those) here: > > http://andover.nag.co.uk/~davidc/ents/ These entity sets are not valid XML. However, it would be interesting to use unicode.xml to produce XML-valid entity sets for all ISO characters with known Unicode codepoints. Maybe in my CFT I'll take care of it, but surely someone else has done this by now? -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: More entity confusion and my op, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: More entity confusion and my op, John E. Simpson |
Re: Feature Request: a fail conditi, Eduardo Gutentag | Date | Re: Feature Request: a fail conditi, Tyler Baker |
Month |