Subject: Re: More entity confusion and my opinion on the right way From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 18:59:36 -0500 (EST) |
[Chris Olds in private e-mail] > In what way are the .pen files not valid XML? They look fine to me. ... oh. I apologize to everyone. I assumed that .pen files would be parameter entity files, suitable for insertion into your DTD to call the corresponding .gml file. I did wonder why, since it's just as easy to call the .gml in the first place. Chris Olds is absolutely right, and the .pen files look like valid XML. The only question remaining is: why ".pen"? -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: More entity confusion and my op, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: More entity confusion and my op, David Carlisle |
Re: Feature Request: a fail conditi, Tyler Baker | Date | Re: More entity confusion and my op, John E. Simpson |
Month |