Subject: Re: Feature Suggestion - result subtrees as macro arguments(REVISED) From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:21:48 +0700 |
"G. Ken Holman" wrote: > I've come across a situation where I'd like to supply to the macro a > fragment of the result tree as the value of an argument I think this is something XSL ought to provide. At the moment macros in effect have a) any number of named arguments of type string; these are passed with xsl:arg and accessed with arg() expressions b) one anonymous argument of type "result tree fragment"; this is passed as the content of xsl:invoke, and accessed via xsl:contents This doesn't seem quite right... James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Feature Suggestion - result subtree, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: Comments and entities was:, keshlam |
Re: Feature Request - Node Set Proc, James Clark | Date | Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |