Subject: Re: GOTCHA! From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 14:17:52 +0200 |
From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Hi Oren. > >For output JScript I've been using what MS recommends ie., > > //<xsl:comment> > <![CDATA[ > ...Script... > ]]> > //</xsl:comment> > >...which seems to work fine for the IE5b2 parser. Not sure how it would >fare for XT. Wouldn't, and rightly so. The fact that there's a CDATA in the input just protects the characters when being parsed. There's no way in XSL to ask for a CDATA section in the output. Actually, an <xsl:cdata> tag would be the closest possible to the <xsl:not-xml> tag I'd like. It falls under the current intent; it ensures the output is valid XML; it is cleaner then using the <xsl:comment> tag; and it can be used in the same way to embed non-XML code in the output. Any reason we have <xsl:comment> and not <xsl:cdata>? Any chance we may get <xsl:cdata>? Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: GOTCHA!, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: GOTCHA!, Tyler Baker |
Re: Feature Suggestion - result sub, James Clark | Date | Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |