Subject: Re: GOTCHA! From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:01:35 +0000 |
Hi Oren. The MS XSL parser has <xsl:cdata> doing as you describe. Whether MS is inovating or anticipating here is as always an interesting point. Is anybody running a book of odds on these issues? I figure the list as a collective could make some tidy money on the side ::cough:: maybe not. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 01/13/99 10:17:52 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: GOTCHA! From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: [SNIP] Any reason we have <xsl:comment> and not <xsl:cdata>? Any chance we may get <xsl:cdata>? Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Mixed content transformation, Paul_Tihansky | Date | Re: XSL and HTML, Guy_Murphy |
Month |