Subject: Re: GOTCHA! From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:30:50 +0700 |
Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: > > James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Any reason we have <xsl:comment> and not <xsl:cdata>? Any chance we may > get > >> <xsl:cdata>? > > > >I can't see how it would help you. > I would write: > > <script>//<xsl:cdata> > for(i = 10; i >= 0; i--) { > } > //</xsl:cdata></script> And get <script>//<![CDATA[ for(i = 10; i >= 0; i--) { } //]]></script> Seems like a hack to me. It does avoid the problem of -- not being allowed inside comments, but there's already a hack you can use to avoid that problem, which is to use a PI: <script>//<xsl:pi name="xyzzy"> for(i = 10; i >= 0; i--) { } //</xsl:pi></script> None of this is really necessary. For HTML 4.0 you can use result-ns, and in the future, with Voyager, the whole problem goes away. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Re: Existing XSL processors, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: Existing XSL processors, Joel Rosi-Schwartz |
Month |