Subject: Re: Existing XSL processors From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:22:49 +0000 |
Hi Anette. The second part is pretty much up to the browsers. You can output pretty much aything you want (as long as it's well formed) as long as your target browser will support it, and render it. At the moment that leaves us pretty much with HTML and/or XML w/CSS. The second part is more an issue of agreed output than anything. There might be a proof of concept browser/application out there somewhere that supports formatting object as per the current XSL spec, but not in wide circulation. Anybody seen such a beast? Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 01/14/99 07:22:51 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Existing XSL processors Reading the XSL Draft of the w3 consortium it is said: "XSL is a lnaguage for expressing stylsheets. It consists of two parts: 1. a language for transforming XML documents, and 2. an XML vocabulary for specifiying formatting semantics" So far I had a look at XSL engines which implement the first part. Is there by any chance a XSL engine, which implements the second part too? Regards Anette anette.engel@xxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Existing XSL processors, Joel Rosi-Schwartz | Thread | Re: Existing XSL processors, Chris Lilley |
Re: XSL and HTML, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: GOTCHA!, James Clark |
Month |