Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:script and side-effects From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:32:32 -0000 |
> This is a hole in the spec that ought to be patched. > > (I'd prefer that it be patched by adding a brief note stating that > the order of side-effects in user-supplied extension functions is > implementation-dependent. We had such a section in an earlier draft but it seems to have been pruned at some stage, perhaps because it didn't actually say anything very definitive. It's certainly true that anyone who writes extension functions that aren't pure functions is living dangerously. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:script and side-effec, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl:script and side-effec, Kaganovich, Yevgeniy |
Re: [xsl] xsl:script and side-effec, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:include still a probl, Daniel Veillard |
Month |