Subject: RE: [xsl] Functional programming in XSLT From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:36:13 -0000 |
> >> The current proposal for <exsl:function> does not conform to this > >> rule. In particular, the <exsl:result> feature, with all rules > >> governing its use, looks a little bit odd for me. > > > > You're being polite, I think it's weird! Your <uxsl:define>, I > > think, is very close to my <saxon:function>. > > Which are the bits that you think are particularly weird/hard to > implement/bound to cause trouble to newcomers to XSLT? I've just looked at your current spec, as I hadn't been following all the fluctuations as it developed. I'm pleased to see that some of the weirder things didn't make it in! But there are still two things I don't much care for. One is the "implicit result" of an RTF, I'd prefer people to write <exsl:function ...> <exsl:return> <tree/> </exsl:return> </exsl:function> rather than just <exsl:function ...> <tree/> </exsl:function> Yes, it's more verbose, but it's also more consistent, it means there's only one way of doing it instead of two, it detects a class of user errors, and in any case, I'm not sure returning RTFs is that important a use case. Secondly, I don't like treating multiple exsl:result's as a "recoverable error". I can't think of too many existing cases in XSLT 1.0 where people are going to write stylesheets that depend on errors being recovered by one processor, where they are going to have considerable difficulty fixing the error if another processor chooses not to recover from it. I still prefer having a static constraint on where <exsl:return> can appear, but if you can't live with that, have a strict rule that only one may be instantiated. (And incidentally, I prefer "return" to "result". It's in tune with the imperative style of other keywords such as call-template, apply-templates, include, import.) Mike Kay Software AG XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, Jeni Tennison |
RE: [xsl] RE: chaining transformati, DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] Absolute position, Carmelo Montanez |
Month |