Subject: RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0 From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 17:11:49 +0100 |
> > Well, I don't think trig functions are going to make it into > > the core (though one never knows!); > > Why is that? I don't think the group has agreed any definitive criteria for where to draw the line, but the consensus is to try and keep the core reasonably small - a repertoire of functions that most users will use reasonably often; the same kind of cut-off as in XPath 1.0, but applied to a richer collection of data types, and fixing things that are obvious gaps in XPath 1.0. Incidentally, I'd encourage as much comment as possible on this document from the XSLT user community. A lot of the work was done by people whose background is quite different, e.g. SQL: this input has been extremely useful, but means that the pressing concerns of active XPath 1.0 developers might not be as well represented as you might wish. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Chris Bayes | Thread | RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Chris Bayes |
Re: [xsl] Problem Merging multiple , David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Problem Merging multiple , Julian Reschke |
Month |