Subject: RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Versio n 1.0 From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:13:36 +0100 |
> > Mike Kay wrote: > > Does that mean that the functions listed in the sequences part > > is also viable for node-sets? > > Yes, that's the intent. The idea is that a variable which in > XPath 1.0 holds > a node-set, should in XPath 2.0 hold a sequence of nodes, the > sequence being > in document order with no duplicates. That's worthy of note, no duplicates in a sequence; should reduce the number of questions on the list! Regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] passing parameters to an impo, Tanzila Mohammad |
[xsl] org.apache.xml.utils.DefaultE, ASTI Legaspi, Calen | Date | [xsl] html to xsl........, Vadiraj |
Month |