Subject: RE: [xsl] catching the last node still satisfying a condition From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:34:31 +0100 |
> Exactly, but I've cant find the right words. Sorry for > misunderstanding. The result is quite the same, isn't it? I've no idea whether the result is the same, since I've no idea what you mean by "recordsets" and "arrays" in an XPath context. If you're trying to say that XPath collections are sets rather than sequences, and that you therefore can't index them positionally, then that's obviously wrong. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] catching the last node st, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] catching the last node st, Dimitar Peikov |
RE: [xsl] outputing elements correc, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] forward references from n, David Carlisle |
Month |