Subject: Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e From: Robert Stuart <Robert.Stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:56:43 -0000 |
Why not flag d-o-e as deprecated? Remove the feature around xsl.4, or later. This should give time for the feature to disappear from tools and texts - or at least, for fair warning to be given. Cheers Robert Stuart =================== Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 14:58:21 GMT From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e [snip] However I agree with you that almost all uses of d-o-e are either abuses of the system or indications of missing functionality that ought to be added. It's hard to think of any good use of the feature. But partly for that reason I suspect it's too late to get rid of it. the world being what it is, there are more abusers than people of good taste, (not on this list of course, where the oposite is true). I suspect there would be howls of pain from users if the feature went, with possibly fatal effects on xslt2 deployment. [snip] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL-FO in the browser (Was: Re: [xs, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Joerg Pietschmann | Date | Re: Regular expression functions (W, David Carlisle |
Month |