Subject: Re: [xsl] is there really a need for location steps of ".."? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:59:25 -0500 |
(The fact that ancestor:: is a reverse axis has a bearing on which node you'll get back, for example, from //part/ancestor::*[1], but not on the "order of nodes" in a set.)
Cheers! Wendell
___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_ "Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it extensively for a perch." -- Thoreau
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is there really a need fo, Robert P. J. Day | Thread | [xsl] dynamic XPath?, Yue Ma |
[xsl] Auto-Numbering, Jack Cane | Date | [xsl] Looping on a set value while , Alex Dragowski |
Month |