Subject: Re: [xsl] is there really a need for location steps of ".."? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:39:40 -0500 |
my original question was based more on aesthetics than efficiency.
it just struck me as curious that so many of the examples i saw in the docs i was reading insisted on creating paths that involved "backing up" to parents or ancestors, that's all.
i was just taking it as a challenge to rewrite such paths using the second form.
<xsl:template match="//element"> <xsl:apply-templates/> </xsl:template>
Cheers, Wendell
___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_ "Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it extensively for a perch." -- Thoreau
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is there really a need fo, Robert P. J. Day | Thread | Re: [xsl] is there really a need fo, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] manipulate xml with xsl/j, Mike Brown | Date | RE: [xsl] copy XML and add attribut, Americo Albuquerque |
Month |