Subject: RE: [xsl] reverse and forward order From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:13:19 +0100 |
> At 19:16 11/04/2003 +0100, Michael Kay wrote: > >ancestor::*[1] selects the immediate ancestor (the parent) > >(ancestor::*)[1] selects the ultimate ancestor (the document element) > > > > Are you sure? > > The ultimate ancestor (or ancestor first in document order) > is the document > node in XSLT 2.0 (root node in XSLT 1.0) not the document > element as you > suggest above. > I used ancestor::* not ancestor::node() in my example. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] reverse and forward order, Andrew Watt | Thread | Fw: [xsl] reverse and forward order, Agnes Kielen |
RE: [xsl] namespaces and xsl:templa, Christof Schneider | Date | Re: [xsl] How to render TEI <div*>s, James J. Ramsey |
Month |