Subject: Re: [xsl] formatting xml output: inserting newlines between generated attributes From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:31:07 -0400 |
In the case of node-set(), however, it is just about the commonest extension function out there (most processors have a version of it), so (given you have to mind your namespace bindings and all that) it's still quite portable. Also, its functionality will be built into XSLT/XPath 2.0, which also mitigates the problem of application-dependency over the longer term (not that there won't be adjustments to make).
ok. so I'll be able to build a tree in 2.0 also. but you had said that it would be transparent. do you feel that vendors of 2.0 will still support node-set() usage? (I guess we can ask michael kay about saxon, at least).
also, leaving aside compatibility issues, what do you think about constructing a tree within one xslt vs. having a 2-step transform?
Cheers, Wendell
abie
_________________________________________________________________ Compare Cable, DSL or Satellite plans: As low as $29.95. https://broadband.msn.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] formatting xml output: in, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Noob: Just a simple table, bu, Barry van Weldam |
Re: [xsl] formatting xml output: in, Abie Hamaoui | Date | Re: [xsl] Need to fill in number of, Steve Freeman |
Month |