Subject: RE: [xsl] Count() nodes ?? From: "Passin, Tom" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:19:35 -0400 |
[ Dipesh Khakhkhar] > I didn't got your point fo this "Incidentally, using //Root > rather than /Root > to access the document element is appallingly inefficient." > "//Root" forces the processor to look through the entire document looking for all "Root" elements that it may be able to find, no matter how deeply nested they may be. "/Root" forces the processor to look for all "Root" elements that are children of the document node - it knows that there can only be one, and it already knows how to get that one. "Appallingly inefficient", yes? Cheers, Tom P XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Count() nodes ??, Wendell Piez | Thread | [xsl] [recursion pattern] sophistic, Romeo Disca |
[xsl] Converting nested XSL-HTMLs m, SANWAL, ABHISHEK (HP | Date | Re: [xsl] Authority For Western Lin, Tony Graham |
Month |