Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:38:38 +0100 |
> What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to > define user data types inline in a stylesheet But you can! <xsl:stylesheet ... <xsl:import-schema namespace="http://localhost/"> <xs:schema targetNamespace="http://localhost"> <xs:simpleType name="hatSize"> <xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedInteger"> <xs:maxInclusive value="10"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> </xs:schema> </xsl:import-schema> <xsl:function name="my:measurements" as="my:hatSize"> ... </xsl:function> </xsl:stylesheet> Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Eric van der Vlist |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, David Carlisle |
Month |