Subject: Re: [xsl] Advocate for C# .NET + 100% XSLT Processing From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:38:03 -0700 |
Yes, the IHttpHandler approach is an excellent approach and indeed *ditches* the presentational aspect of ASP.NET nicely ; ) You can achieve similar by Killing the HTML code on an ASPX page and then just knocking out the Page_Load event and othter auto-generated code. Infact, I've devised my own event driven model based on the idea that every web project will probably flow through a MAIN processing template then stub out to PAGE level processing. Keeping this "on-topic" I have also created generic XSL stylesheets that are automatically included at the base level application code, but then is replaced by more specific page level XSL stylesheets. These stylesheet inherit from a base stylesheet, well actually inherit from a site stylesheet and then the base stylesheet. Simple, yet genius. Karl.. On 3/10/06, Nick Fitzsimons <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Karl Stubsjoen wrote: > > I am an XSLT junky.. I get it. > > I also get C# and .NET, and I too was a EXTREMELY heavy ASP developer > > ( Ref: http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200309/msg00227.html ) > > > > This is mostly a shout out, and feel free to shout back. > > > > Is there such sites dedicated to this approach? Oh, I should mention > > that, to qualify as a C# + 100% XSLT Processing member, you must vow > > to never NEVER use the .NET design UI. Strip it out! Lose the page > > wrapped in a FORM tag! Say goodbye to the calendar control! Besides > > you can write a better one with XSLT! > > > > Karl.. > > At a previous job I got a good way through converting our existing CMS > (ASP + XSLT) to this approach, but wasn't able to get it to a deployable > state before business dried up and I was made redundant. > > The approach I eventually settled on was to extend > System.Web.IHttpHandler, thus ditching all presentational aspects of > ASP.NET. It was a neat system and, if I get back into .NET stuff, I'll > do the same again. > > FWIW, the clients I'm curently working with are taking the same > approach, but powered by the Java Servlet API. The architectural > similarities to my system are interesting, given that their version 1 > system (we're live with version 2 in a week) was created about 5 years > ago. I suppose good ideas never go out of fashion. > > Cheers, > > Nick. > -- > Nick Fitzsimons > http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Advocate for C# .NET + 10, Nick Fitzsimons | Thread | Re: [xsl] Advocate for C# .NET + 10, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] How do I convert the use , Mark Carlson | Date | Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html, Nick Fitzsimons |
Month |