Subject: Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html From: Nick Fitzsimons <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:16:43 +0000 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "andrew welch"
On 3/10/06, Anthony Ettinger <aettinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<pre>? ouch.Care to expand on that one... or is it too painful?
Yes please let us know what's so bad about it.
I know it's deprecated as well as XMP but what's the alternative and why are they so bad?
Joe
Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html, Joe Fawcett | Thread | Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html, Joe Fawcett |
Re: [xsl] Advocate for C# .NET + 10, Karl Stubsjoen | Date | Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html, Joe Fawcett |
Month |