Subject: Re: XS: Ports --> math From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 10:05:49 +0100 (BST) |
> I found ports the hardest thing to implement in Jade. I also think they're > hard to explain/understand. > > Ports are currently essential for two flow objects: > They are used in the math flow objects; do you mean that they are not essential there? Which brings me to math. Jon started to say that basing XS on what Jade had implemented was not a bad idea; but James _has_ implemented the math objects, and I would suggest they deserve a place in XS. Since the W3C has in parallel with XML beavered away on defining MathML as an application of XML, it would seem perverse for XS not to deal with it. James raised the question of whether MathML can be dealt with by DSSSL math flow objects; I haven't looked in any detail at all, but my initial impression is that for the presentation math tags, it should not be a problem. For the semantic math, other questions arise, perhaps. One of the arguments in favour of semantic math markup is that it provides a rational way of working out equation breaks. Since DSSSL math is presentation-based, the wrapping DSSSL code will have to do the understanding of semantic math, right? But its hard to do equation breaking without font metrics, so how will DSSSL communicate to the formatter about breaking? Jeff Suttor mentioned this too. He can bring a clearer understanding than me to the issue. I'd hate to see math left aside a mad rush to support damned silly things like <blink> :-} Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XS: Ports, Henry S. Thompson | Thread | Re: XS: Ports, James Clark |
Re: XS: Ports, James Clark | Date | XS: needed features?, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |