Subject: Re: Graphic Size Problem From: Alexander Taranov <tay@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 15:34:27 +0400 (MSD) |
Norman Walsh writes: > / Chuck Darney <cdarney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> was heard to say: > | I've just started using Word97 (from Word95) and find that the graphic > | signature I have in the document now extends across the page instead of > | a reasonable signature size. I've tried adding "scale:'max" and "scale: > | 'max-uniform" with "max-width" and "max-height" statements in the "make > | external-graphic". This is found in dbgraph.dsl. > > There are (apparently) some difficult/impossible to control interactions > between scaling and the Word graphic import filters. In practice, I think > this means you can't set the height or width of graphics. > > However, based on a report of success, I've added support for > the scale attribute on graphic to db108b7. So if the image is > twice as big as it should be, you may be able to say "scale=50" > on the graphic and get Word to make it the right size. No > promises, it hasn't actually worked for me yet. I suspect that it is me who initiated this patch to db108. I've never try it with RTF backend, but it works with TEX backend. alexander > > | On a similar vein, has anyone used WordPerfect to read the RTF files? > | There are some significant difference in the look. Graphics don't read > | at all. Is there any way to make WordPerfect work better? > > Have you tried the rtf-95 backend? > > --norm > > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Graphic Size Problem, Norman Walsh | Thread | RE: Graphic Size Problem, Richard Folwell |
RE: Basic footnotes - my answer (o, Pawson, David | Date | Re: Output Postscript and Plain Tex, Steve Roggenkamp |
Month |