RE: About Constructions rules

["Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Matthias,

Your point is well taken. So your point is:
a) If we talk about a non pattern matched behavior for a query type
construct let's not call it a "query" construction rule. this way, new
experimental DSSSL-2 constructs would not be confounded with DSSSL-1 specs
objects.

Our focus should be on improving OpenJade to be more conform to the specs.

Then, would the query construction rule as specified by the specs would be
useful to be implemented. Comments?

The first suggestion is that it could be useful to pattern match on some
non-elements nodes like 1) processing instructions, 2) properties, 3) data
(no so sure of this one). the element and PI construction rules are
restricted to solely element pattern match. Thus, the query construction
rule opens the door to other documents objects being processed.

regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netfolder.com


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist