Daily News.
Archived Weekly. Click
Here For The Current Issue.


Click the 'OK'
to make the ERN your default homepage
If you wish to receive the
Electronic Recruiting News as a daily email, please use the form at the
bottom of the page to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Thank you -
Interbiznet Staff
Typical Bonehead Thinking
(October 31, 2000) Anyone reading this newsletter will be familiar
with the ongoing debates about "cost per hire". Somehow, the unique
history of the Human Resources function and the nearly complete absence of
basic business education in the industry has conspired to create a narrow
view of the relative importance of Recruiting.
- The sage Saratoga
Institute, often seen as the ultimate source of HR thinking,
typically describes "cost per hire" as the sum of administrative costs
and expenses.
- Infomart-USA, a hiring
practices auditing company, estimates the national average at about
$4,400. They consider the following elements of cost per hire.
- Advertising
- Agency fees
- Employment fairs
- Employment office salary expense
- Employment office facility expense
- Estimate of time spent in training
- Recruiter travel expense
- Internal recruiter expenses
- Internal recruiter labor expense
- Referral Bonus
- Recruiting & Training Expense
- Uniforms
HRLive (which isn't very)
offers five year old data that suggests an average cost per hire nearer
to $8,000.
American Incite, an odd
online Executive Search operation makes a lengthy
argument that the base salaries used to calculate the administrative
cost per hire is deeply understated. Yawn. While these overly
complex approaches may well capture the number of dollars spent on an
average hire, they hardly begin to capture the cost of a hire. Hiring
managers, insulated from the nonsense measurements of the HR folks, have a
clearer picture. The cost of a hire is the money lost because the hire
wasn't made. Well recognized in MBA programs and broadly understood
throughout the rest of the organization, the simple concept is "opportunity
costs".
At its most basic, the opportunity cost associated with a particular
hire is the productive revenue lost because the hire wasn't made. Ask an
IT manager with 20% of her desks unfilled whether she cares about the
administrative costs in the Recruiting department. Of course she doesn't.
She's working weekends and late evenings while continuing to miss
deadlines. She is experiencing the real cost per hire: revenue lost
from employees who weren't hired.
Here's an easy way to get your arms around the real cost per hire in
your organization:
- Take the annual sales of your company (or division) and divide it by
the number of employees. This is the annual revenue per employee.
- Divide that number by 250 to get the daily revenue per employee.
- Multiply daily revenue per employee by the number of days it takes
to hire an employee.
- If you want, add the dollars spent by the Recruiting Department
(it's a minor fraction).
- This is the real cost per hire, generally it's 5 to 10 times the
administrative costs.
This view of "cost per hire" points out
the importance of reaching real global standards for reductions in the
hiring cycle. Current "state of the art" approaches try to reduce the
cycle to under a month. We believe that the real answer is to target a
recruiting cycle time of minus 30 days.
- John Sumser
Contacting Us:
Call, fax, write, email. We'd love to
talk about your project.
All material on this site is © 1995 - 2000 by IBN:
interbiznet.com
(The Internet Business Network), 346 Starling Rd., Mill
Valley, CA 94941
415.380.8244
staff@interbiznet.com
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe From the
ERNIE...