[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Monthly Archives] [List Home]

[ernie] The Electronic Recruiting News In Email_010307




IBN: Defining Excellence in Electronic Recruiting
Please Click On Our Sponsors
  John Sumser's
  Electronic Recruiting News


interbiznet.com

E R N I E
Electronic Recruiting News In Email

Our Rate Card

S P O N S O R S


Click Here!
Click On Our Sponsors
Click On Our Sponsors

Reach The 25,000 Recruiters and HR Managers Who Read This Newsletter Each Week
Click On Our Sponsors

Click On Our Sponsors

Find out more
About IBN
Got a news tip?

Got a news tip?
Tell us at
news@
interbiznet.com

Our Rate Card

Articles

Presentations

Trends Reports

Archives

Resume
Databases

(Over 60)

Company Job Listings
(Over 4000)

Suggestions?



It is better
to not be on
the web than
to be on and
not know why

John Sumser

Reality
is more
complex
than
it seems.
John Gall


It's better to
do a few things
really well than
than to do
a lot of things
badly.
If you can't
make the necessary
commitments of
time and energy
to your
electronic
marketing
efforts
scale back
your plan.
John Sumser

All material in this
email is the
property of IBN
(The Internet
Business Network:
interbiznet.com)
You may download
a copy for personal
use. Redistribution
without permission
is strictly
prohibited.
All material in
this email is
© 1995 - 2001 by IBN



OUR HOME

The Electronic Recruiting News is a Free Daily Newsletter For Recruiters, HR Managers, Advertising Agencies and Clasified Advertising Operations

To subscribe or unsubscribe from ERNIE, please use the form on the linked page.


Workflow

(March 07, 2001) Periodically, we remind our readers to watch Dave Winer's work. Winer, who runs a software/publishing company called Userland, is systematically ferreting out the possibilities and potentials of the web. It's scary and frustrating work.

Winer operates at the edge of the radar but is closely watched. His flagship newsletter, the Scripting News, is a sometimes focused, sometimes rambling view of the Internet, the software industry and the changes that are happening in society and our organizations.

As we watch companies adjust their communications to account for the web's flattening, we're tickled at the difference between the provocative an the status quo. The following article describes, in cynical detail, Dave's perspective on workflow.
***Workflow

Yesterday I spent a bunch of time talking with Robert Scoble, a conference manager at Fawcette, who's very bright and trying to figure out what's going on here, same as me.

One of the questions that keeps coming up is why (or is) what we're doing at UserLand different from the other content management companies, Vignette, ATG, Interwoven, Broadvision. Clearly it is different, if for no other reason that our software costs much less. But that's just the beginning of the story.

One of the elusive features that others provide that we don't is called "workflow." I wonder why we never implemented it and they did. I wonder why it never showed up on my radar, yet it seems so central to what they do. And then I had an aha. What follows is strong, so don't read it if you can't stand a strong point of view.

The purpose of workflow is to keep content off the web. To provide a sense of security to company management that all the right people have to approve something before anyone outside the company can read it. This can include relatively harmless checks, like making sure that Web standards are respected, or it can make sure that the company's lies are preserved, that no truth leaks out from behind the firewall. If every statement has to get through the legal department, top management, human resources, etc, so the theory goes, our company or organization can't get in trouble.

Now I understand why it's not in our software. Our job is to make it *easy* for people to get their ideas on to the Web, not hard. If you have layers of editors in your way, I know that this starts warping your personality, to the point where the work becomes tedious even demoralizing. I said a few weeks ago (on Scripting News, my weblog) that the Web these guys are writing for is not the same Web I write for, the one I write for depends on people's judgment and recognizes that companies are made up of people, and sometimes people make mistakes. That's preferable, imho, to a story that either never gets told or is told untruthfully.

Last week one of my people said something to someone outside the company that made me cringe. I explained to him carefully why I don't want us to say things that way. It could be big trouble. But I didn't put a gag on him. I know he cares, and I know he does good work, and that's one of the risks you take by giving your people a voice.

I remember when Brent Simmons launched his weblog, after much prodding from me. I freaked out. "Now I'm not the only public voice of my company on the Web." But I had a little talk with myself "Dave, you *wanted* him to do this," I said. The initial shock is long gone, and now I can't imagine a Web without Brent. He's a fantastic teacher, a great writer, as long as he wants to write publicly, I want to read it, and I want everyone who wants to to be able to.

So the bottom-line is that we are different because our natural customers are the people inside an organization, and the content management products are sold to management. Our purpose is to flow stuff out to the Web, and honestly, from my point of view, the other guys' purpose is to *not* flow stuff out to the Web. There's more money in their business, because the management has more money, but there's more Web in our business.

Over and over I learn that the barriers we erected in the past that define workplaces don't work when the Web comes into the equation. We're not the only ones. You can route around content firewalls by starting an eGroup and inviting all interested people outside your company to participate. Instant messaging and email are also route-arounds.

So workflow is an illusion, like those silly non-disclosure agreements that firewalls attach to the end of outgoing (public) emails. The Web is revolutionary, it's hard to sell security with integrity when there's a revolution (still) going on.

Dave Winer

(c) Copyright 1994-2001, Dave Winer. http://davenet.userland.com/.
"It's even worse than it appears."

- John Sumser

******************************************************************************************

   What position can Sendouts.com put your firm in?

      A more competitive one.

     Find out how:

  • Get access to hundreds of thousands of qualified candidates.
  • Manage every step of the placement process.
  • Establish a stronger presence on the web.
   Do it all with one web-based application for under $100 a month.

   Final reason to visit us:
   Get over $500 in savings with our introductory offer package.

Contacting Us:
Call, fax, write, email. We'd love to talk about your project.

All material on this site is © 1995 - 2001 by IBN: interbiznet.com
(The Internet Business Network), 346 Starling Rd., Mill Valley, CA 94941
415.380.8244
staff@interbiznet.com



To Subscribe or Unsubscribe From the ERNIE...
Enter email:
Enter name:
 

     FEATURES:

  • Interbiznet Trends (New)
  • Email Newsletters
         - Daily Industry News
         - ERN in Email

         ANNUAL REPORTS:
         - 2001
         - 2000
         - 1999
         - 1997
         - 1996
         - Report Pricing

         RESOURCES:

  • Top 100 E-Recruiters
  • Presentations
  • Recruiter's Toolkit
  • Seminar In A Box
  • ERN Archives
  • 1st Steps In The Hunt

         ADVERTISING:

  • Our Rate Card


    Last Week's ERN

    March 4, 2001
  • When In Doubt
  • Community
  • It's A Song
  • Targeting
  • RIP

    ERN Archives


    Past Issues
    About interbiznet
    interbiznet publications