Subject: Re: length-spec vs. length for characteristics From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 12:09:13 +0700 |
At 22:19 16/04/97 -0400, Tony Graham wrote: >Does this mean that only for characteristics with a length-spec value, >I can use display-size (also introduced in 12.5.2) to return a >length-spec that I can use when setting the value of the >characteristic? Yes. > What other ways are there for arriving at a >length-spec instead of a plain old length? table-unit and by using + - * / on length-specs. >For that matter, what specifies the "value flow object" for >display-size? It's the flow object that the characteristic applies to. See the definitions of the inherited-C and actual-C procedures. >I was started on this tack by looking at the following characteristics >of the box flow object class and their values: > > box-corner-radius length-spec > box-size-before length > box-size-after length > start-indent length-spec > end-indent length-spec > >For example, why is box-corner-radius a length-spec and >box-size-before a length? box-size-before/after only applies to inline flow objects, so there's no real reason why you would need it to be a length-spec. On the other hand with a displayed box, it's conceivable you might want the radius of the corners to be proportional to the display-size. Sometimes it's a bit random which characteristics are lengths and which are length-specs. James
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
length-spec vs. length for characte, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: length-spec vs. length for char, Paul Prescod |
length-spec vs. length for characte, Tony Graham | Date | Re: length-spec vs. length for char, Paul Prescod |
Month |