Subject: Re: Jade and hyperdocuments From: Vivek Agrawala <vivek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 14:00:44 -0400 |
James Clark wrote: > > The parser and grove builder are indeed perfectly capable of dealing with > multiple groves already. However the style language engine assumes in > several places that it's dealing with a single grove. For example, when > parsing element construction rules, it normalizes the GIs using the concrete > syntax of the grove. If there can be multiple groves (with potentially > different concrete syntaxes), this technique cannot be used. The stuff > relating to cross-referencing/linking in the backends also assumes a single > grove. Will the normalization of GIs work if all groves use the same concrete syntax? > At 10:42 22/04/97 -0400, David Megginson wrote: > >As far as I can > >tell by reading the source, Jade is entirely capable of dealing with > >multiple groves already, except that someone would need to write a > >class to build the grove. For the case when all groves use the same concrete syntax, one kludgy solution is to create a "combined-DTD" and "combined-SGML" and parse that as one grove. The combined-grove will have the original groves as children. -- Vivek Agrawala, Ph.D. Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. email: vivek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade and hyperdocuments, James Clark | Thread | Re: Jade and hyperdocuments, James Clark |
Re: Viewports 'Visible' property vs, Henry S. Thompson | Date | Legal DSSSL? was: Viewports 'Visibl, Paul Prescod |
Month |