Subject: Side-effect freedom (Re: When transformation language) From: Vivek Agrawala <vivek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 16:24:14 -0400 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > I would be curious if people who are skilled in the transformation language > (perhaps in thought experiments :) ), could comment on the types of jobs > that would be substantially easier with it than with Jade's style language > extensions for SGML transformations. One thing I've noticed is that the > transformation language seems to work on arbitrary groves and not just SGML > document groves. Is that right?. What else differentiates it? Thanks for > any information. Does anyone know if the transformation language is also side-effect free? If so, why? For the style language, one major reason mentioned here was the need to simplify implementation of browser/editor type applications. But that may not be relevant for the transformation language. Also, could someone point me to a good discussion of the pros & cons of freedom from side-effects? I am still struggling with problem of writing code without maintaining state. -- Vivek Agrawala, Ph.D. Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. email: vivek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
When transformation language, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Side-effect freedom (Re: When t, Paul Prescod |
Re: Characterstic Specification, Paul Prescod | Date | question on mapping of character en, Kevin Desmarais |
Month |