Subject: Re: bug in jade?? From: Taranov Alexander <tay@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 97 17:48 MSD |
Paul Prescod writes: > > with modular docbook.dsl by Norman Walsh style-sheet > > I'm going to be that this is the problem. Construction rules in one part > of a style-specification are more specific than any construction rule in > a subsequent part except when a mode is in use. That means that a > > (default ....) > > rule overrides every rule in a following style-specification rule (for > example). I could see how this would be non-intuitive in situations and > perhaps DSSSL should give you more control. You can use general text entities > instead of independent DSSSL style sheet documents to concatenate rules > without changing their relative specifity. > > Paul Prescod > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist Thanks, it is just so ! This means that if one really want modularity, he should use helper functions. Alexander Taranov DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: bug in jade??, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: bug in jade??, Norman Walsh |
Re: bug in jade??, Vivek Agrawala | Date | Re: bug in jade??, Paul Prescod |
Month |