Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolute-Child-Number

Subject: Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolute-Child-Number
From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 17:14:27 +0200 (MET DST)

Not so much a desparate, but perhaps a dump question: what does CPS stand for ?

Regards, Matthias

On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Frank Christoph wrote:

> Acutally, CPS style is a very popular way of writing interpreters for eager
> languages, and it is considerably easier to implement first-class continuations
> in an interpreter than in a compiler.  (Then again, it is considerably easier
> to implement an interpreter than a compiler, period.)  There are several
> compilers, also, that transform the entire program into CPS form and then
> emit code based on that representation because it maps very closely onto
> the way computers actually work, namely sequentially and with iterative
> control constructs.  SML/NJ and several Scheme compilers are implemented
> this way.
> 
>   -- FC
> 
> 
>  DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
> 


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread