Subject: Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolute-Child-Number From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 17:04:33 -0400 |
W. Eliot Kimber wrote: > > At 11:47 AM 6/25/97 -0700, Joe English wrote: > >Can you solve this problem with an architectural transformation? > > If JADE kept all the architectural instance groves in memory it would be > possible to use any of them to do this sort of thing quickly and easily > using the appropriate architectures. However, JADE doesn't, so I can't. I think that DSSSL itself would have to be extended to allow you to set up construction rules based on various architectures. Conflicts been construction rules for varoius architectures might be a problem. I think this is what the transformation language was supposed to be for. You could map all of those to a single element in the transformation. Paul Prescod DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Jade MIF Binary, Paul Prescod | Thread | Iteration with named let, W. Eliot Kimber |
Jade MIF Binary, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: DSSSL query feature, James Clark |
Month |