Subject: Re: The DSSSList Digest V1 #199 From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 10:56:39 GMT |
>From: Paul Grosso <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: Some XSL Questions > >There is no XSL spec. The only XSL document that exists (publicly or >otherwise) is the submission made last August and acknowledged by the W3C >staff last September: > <http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL-970910> >As a submission, it is only a partial starting point, and detailed discussion >of it is of very questionable utility (and I suspect most of the authors of >the submission will not find it well worth their time to reply). ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If so, that is disappointing. Why bother having a partial starting point document in the public arena if it is not a partial starting point for the discussion? Sorry to waste the time of people on the list. Thanks, Norm for your help! Guess I was mislead by the document I downloaded from the Arbortext Web Site last week written by Paul Grosso called "XSL - a proposed stylesheet for XML". Towards the end it says:- "Given the attention and expertise put into this draft and the relatively wide range of input it has already had, it is reasonable to expect that the final draft form of XSL will not be substantially different from the current proposal." Sean Mc Grath sean at digitome dot com DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
pre-release DocBook Stylesheets 1.0, Norman Walsh | Thread | NEWBIE Question, Chuck Darney |
pre-release DocBook Stylesheets 1.0, Norman Walsh | Date | Re: pdftex archive troubles, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |