Subject: Re: Q: Include graphics in Jade output? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 09:57:09 +0100 |
> OK, but does it [jadetex] do it right? Probably. (I would say `probably not', except that Sebastian's on holiday and so wouldn't be able to defend himself:-) > This looks great in Ghostview In that case most likely the Postscript is right. > but our Lexmark printers abort with an error message This could be a problem in the PostScript interpreter but most likely it is a problem with your print spooler not understanding DSC comments (or the DSC comments in the original EPS file being wrong, both of which are rather common, unfortunately) Try using dvips -K that will zap the comments from included files, or even dvips -N which stops dvips putting in any comments at all. > the structured > comments are what's doing it, because manually removing those (or, > better, leaving just the "%%BoundingBox:" one in the EPS file for TeX > to read) will cause it to work just fine). sounds like -K is what you want. > Is it the Lexmark Postscript interpreter that's buggy? No. A comment is a comment and not seen by the interpreter. It sounds like your print spooler is not reading the nested structure right and deciding that your whole job is to finish at the point the included graphic finishes, and so effectively truncating the file at that point. David PS Sorry for the lack of dsssl in this message DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Q: Include graphics in Jade out, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo | Thread | Re: Q: Include graphics in Jade out, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo |
Re: Q: Include graphics in Jade out, Dr. Markus Hönicka | Date | XSL WD is out, Frank Boumphrey |
Month |