Subject: RE: Underscores part II From: "Frank A. Christoph" <christo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 18:40:38 +0900 |
>At the risk of not being taken seriously anymore on this list, I must >confess I'm finding (parts of) DSSSL rather difficult. I'm wondering if it >has to do with my background, which is in humanities. (I'm currently working >as a tech writer at a software company). I've been working with SGML for >some time and am comfortable with it, but I have *absolutely no* programming >experience. > >I'm wondering if most DSSSL users have a programming background? Or does it >just take some time to learn DSSSL? I'm used to learning things within a >couple of days, but this is taking me weeks already. DSSSL stylesheets are written using a full-fledged programming language derived from Scheme, so if you have managed to write a non-trivial stylesheet without the benefit of some programming experience, you deserve a pat on the back. And, yes, I expect most people on this list have a programming background, although most are more familiar with conventional, imperative languages like C than with functional, "declarative" (I don't think Scheme is very declarative) languages like Scheme. --FC I$??Ëb?ú?Ö«r¯zm§ÿðà ®?·«¯+^r(?÷l²ÉvË,?+-
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Underscores part II, Linda van den Brink | Thread | Re: Underscores part II, Jack Fitzpatrick |
RE: Underscores part II, Linda van den Brink | Date | Re: 3 questions, Paul Prescod |
Month |