RE: About the source library

Subject: RE: About the source library
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:04:17 +0000 (GMT)
Didier PH Martin writes:
 > <Reply>
 > I agree with you. So let's compose a letter to James to ask him what are his
 > thoughts on this.
 > </Reply>
I think James is probably reading all this, however silently :-}

 > The idea is to try to have three family of modules:
 > 
 > a) Grove/DOM
 > b) Script engines
 > c) formatting object mappers (backbends)
splendid. 

 > This way, for example, a XSL or DSSSL processor could be running on a Grove
 > (the grove being created either by a XML or SGML document). And formatting
 > objects mappers called dependent of the type of format expected. I am

let me get this straight; you would end up with an archtecture in
which I could remove the DSSSL script processor, insert an XSL one,
but still use a TeX backend? now there is indeed a worthy project. I
want one.

Sebastian


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread