Subject: Re: About the source library From: Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 06:00:27 -0400 |
/ "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> was heard to say: | Hi Normand Uh, Norman, actually ;-) | What features of HyTime are not possible in XML? Remember, XML is SGML. | | <reply> | Simple, full SGML architectural form processing ;-) Also, some Hytime Architectural forms are fixed attributes, there's nothing in XML that precludes fixed attributes. | constructs are based on the terrible (in the XML world) - 0 Omittag (yes I | said it, I'll rest in the eternal flames :-) You can't base things on tag ommission, it's just a typing shortcut. Perhaps HyTime is harder to understand if the tags are not omitted, but that's not XMLs fault ;-) | Keep in mind that W3C is creating a competing linking spec (XLL and | XPointer) and that XML and Hytime is probably less (a lot less in fact) | probable than XML and XLL/XPointer Personally, I wouldn't characterize XLink and XPointer as "competition" with HyTime, just an alternative. But I agree that HyTime is less likely to be implemented. But HyTime has never been widely implemented. Cheers, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> | We dance around in a ring and http://nwalsh.com/ | suppose, but the Secret sits in | the middle and knows.--Robert Frost DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: About the source library, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: About the source library, Didier PH Martin |
RTF to PDF (was Re: jade/jadetex wi, Ron Ross | Date | RE: About the source library, Didier PH Martin |
Month |